Avsar Prayer Kilim, Sariz, Kayseri, second half of the 19th c. (153x107cm)

Some designs continue to confound scholars, collectors and aficionados of rugs and kilims. For many years, Manastir textiles were repeatedly misattributed, and even today they sit somewhat uneasily within the conventional categories of Anatolian material culture. The rare kilim considered here is another contested object, generating markedly different opinions and theories concerning its origin. Michael Papadopoulos places it firmly within the Konya tradition, while José Luczyc-Wyhowska—co-author with Alastair Hull of Kilim: The Complete Guide—appears to regard this design as a continuation of the weaving traditions associated with Bergama. Such conflicting assessments raise a broader question: how securely can regional identities be assigned to textiles whose designs may have travelled with migrating communities, crossed established geographical boundaries, or preserved much older visual traditions?

Note that Avsar Prayer Kilim, Sariz, Kayseri, second half of the 19th c.  is Bonhams’ descripsion

Category:

Description

    ASK a QUESTION


    The kilim attribution reveals some of the continuing confusion surrounding the regional classification of later nineteenth-century Anatolian kilims. Certain elements—particularly the border system and the treatment of the broad end panels—suggest contact with Western Anatolian weaving traditions, and some observers have consequently proposed a connection with the Bergama area. Michael Papadopoulos likewise recognizes a degree of Western Anatolian influence, principally in the borders, but places the kilim firmly within the broader Konya tradition. This attribution appears the most convincing: the compact organization of the central design, enclosed by successive red and dark-blue fields, remains fundamentally Central Anatolian in character. The related example illustrated on the left was catalogued differently by Bonhams, demonstrating how uncertain—and sometimes rather casual—auction-house attributions of Anatolian flatweaves can be. “Konya,” however, should be understood here as a broad regional and stylistic designation rather than as evidence of manufacture in a particular village.