Posted on

Tree of Life Design Evolution

Understanding of symbols contained in tribal rugs is not always easy.
These symbols go through various transformations and often appear only as abstract forms bearing little resemblance to what they were before.

A classic representation of the Tree of Life in the late 19th or early 2oth century Yagcedebir rug transmogrified over less than a century to become no more than a seemingly decorative motif .

Turn of the 19-20th century Yagcedebir rug section depicting the motif of the Tree of Life

In mid 20th century, the same motif begins to become more geometric but it is still recognizable as an image of a tree:

Mid 20th -centuery rendition of the Tree of Life motif in the Yagcedebir rug

Leter rugs from the same area (Balikirsir, west Anatolia) feature a very abstract form that barely resembles the original but it is also much easier to execute:

Recent production with the Tree of Life symbol recignizable mainly by its location within the rug

Many such motifs underwent similar processes becoming difficult to understand and/or interpret.

Often, only such heavily evolved and abstract motifs are known to younger generations of weavers.

For that very reason , tribal rugs can be only interpreted (understood) if compared to their predecessors (prototypes).

This process is often referred to as the degeneration of a motif or a symbol.  Oftentimes, the level of simplification renders it unrecognizable to scholars as well as weavers.

Consequently, weavers may use such distorted symbols in wrong contexts or simply devoid them of their symbolic weight.

Piotr Wesolowski

All three rugs are available in our collection

Read our 2019 blog on London Wash

Please follow and like us: